Indiana Septic System Forum
May 18, 2012, 03:26:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the Indiana Septic System Forum - Post your question, comments and discussions!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Presby Enviro-Septic  (Read 5302 times)
jmenchhofer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


View Profile
« on: November 06, 2009, 05:49:47 PM »

I am a local health department sanitarian in northwest Ohio, and I have been permitting the installation of Presby Enviro-Septic systems under experimental concurrence approval from Ohio Department of Health for the past two installation seasons.  Because things have been so SLOW here, I currently only have 14 systems installed.  So far, things are going well.  I know there are a LOT more of these systems installed in Indiana, and I am very interested in hearing about your experiences with them.  I'll also share my own experiences in more detail if anyone is interested.
Logged
Toxic Avenger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Septic System Specialist


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2009, 12:02:17 PM »

We don't allow them at all right now in my county in Northern Indiana.  We are letting other counties handle the "experimental" use of these systems, and will determine their effectiveness by looking at their results. 
Logged


Working in the environmental field since 1998.
phil zim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2009, 01:38:48 AM »

We have been installing Presby Systems In Allen County Indiana for about 3 years now with no problems being aware of.  Again proper installation and surface drainage is key for these systems. I would even venture to say that 70% of systems installed now in Allen County are Presby Systems. I feel these are great systems in many ways and usually even cost savings for the owner. If you have any questions Please feel free to contact me, Phil Zimmerman  ZIMMERMAN BROTHERS EXCAVATING  260-489-9967   EMAIL--zimmermanbrothers@verizon.net
Logged
Stuart Meade
www.septicdesign.com
Administrator
Jr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


Forum Administrator - Meade Septic Design, Inc.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2009, 10:54:59 AM »

Presby just announced NSF 40 Certification for their Advanced Enviro-Septic.   Apparently, the advanced Enviro-Septic has an additional layer of "Bio-Accelerator" in the pipe, increased ridges on the pipe to increase surface area and "Skimmers" at each perforation.  http://www.presbyenvironmental.com/  The ISDH will give a presentation during the annual IOWPA meeting to give an update on this product and it's installation. http://www.iowpa.org/files/IOWPA_Winter09_web.pdf
Logged

Septic System Design, consulting and permitting. Specializing in Mound Type Systems  and repairs.  www.septicdesign.com   574-533-1470
LM Excavating
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


LMExcavating.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2010, 02:08:13 AM »

Well according to Presby and ISDH the state reviews didn't go so well and they are wanting to re-educate the installers as per the letter Presby sent me.
Blaming it on perimeter drain errors, well I have installed mound systems WITHOUT drains due to elevation issues, we just sized them up and they worked fine.
Presby could eliminate their problems if they just changed their designs to be larger footprint.

I ALWAYS said even before they were approved (back when Mike was just starting the mess) they were too small and needed to be sized up.
Mound systems in Indiana are already pushing the size limit and Presby always bragged of a smaller footprint.
I always asked why that was something to brag about, almost like Barney bragging about shooting his foot.

In my opinion just another wiz-bang septic system like 100's of other, they just want to size them for failure here in Idiana.
I don't care how "clean" the effluent is, you still have to disperse it.
Logged

Since 1987 we have set the Benchmark for Quality and Innovation in the field of On-Site Sewage Disposal in Southwestern Indiana. Our Goal is to continue to lead the way and Offer only the highest quality in Design, Installation and Service for your Septic System.
http://www.lmexcavating.com/
Indiana Septic System Forum
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2010, 02:08:13 AM »

 Logged
Toxic Avenger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Septic System Specialist


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2010, 05:56:41 PM »

I don't care how "clean" the effluent is, you still have to disperse it.

I couldn't agree more.

Logged


Working in the environmental field since 1998.
LM Excavating
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


LMExcavating.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2010, 02:25:03 PM »

Hey just for kicks,

Mike Market (Guy responsible for Presby in Indiana) always started his presentations with "I am not a Septic Expert",,,,, first thought in my head was always "Yep, then why the hell am I here"

He would always brag how well his system was doing but would never tell you his system is installed in TRENCH format ultimately covering a much larger overall footprint (my opinion the best Presby method) and he has Alford soil if I remember correctly and from what I remember it was installed before the health dept knew about it, at least I know it was years before experimental approval by ISDH.

Mike just lives up the road from me (I've seen his system) and asked me to help him get this product going in Indiana, in which I replied once you get off that smaller footprint crap I may be interested.

Smaller is NOT a bragging point.

How I think of a system is not in trench bottoms or basil area but in total occupied space, largest of which would be trench systems and once you get below that acreage you are pushing the limits in my mind.
In other words, if you have one acre to work with how much system can you fit in that one acre by using it all.
If you used the FULL acre then the sizing would flip and Now Presby would be largest by design figures, mound would be next and trench would be least.
Fact is we still have the same daily flow and the same acre dispersing that flow,,,, so now what do you have to say on sizing???
Little tid bit the trench system would still have the largest interface area.

The reason Presby is designed small is most likely 2 parts,
Most uninformed people think smaller occupied space is better, now we have room for a pool.
2nd and most important, the materials to use Presby in trenches are VERY EXPENSIVE,,
most people DO NOT like that so now we have to figure out how to downsize our material usage to be competitive and package a system in a way we can sell it.

This was the most likely reason Chambers were always and still coming in at a reduction,,,, this way they can be cost competitive and Harvey Homeowner has room for a pool.
The new Infiltrator chamber design,,,, you be the judge,,,
In my opinion it is inferior to the original sidewinder, BUT they pack a WHOLE LOT MORE on a semi these days as they stack better.
Surely a company wanting to make profit wouldn't want to cut shipping cost,,,,, would they???

So FIRST RULE OF THOUGHT ALWAYS,,,,,,,, OK sure you are trying to sell me something but just what am I getting here, and am I supposed to bend over first??

If you put a National TV add out that says eating 10 Big Macs a day will be healthy for you the sales would skyrocket and we would maybe clean out the gene pool in the same stroke.
Logged

Since 1987 we have set the Benchmark for Quality and Innovation in the field of On-Site Sewage Disposal in Southwestern Indiana. Our Goal is to continue to lead the way and Offer only the highest quality in Design, Installation and Service for your Septic System.
http://www.lmexcavating.com/
phil zim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2010, 11:20:12 PM »

The presby system now has NSF approval. If you know very much about septic systems to understand the presby system with getting the air to keep the system aerobic state which is major in any system. If a mound or a shallow trench system is not installed or maintenanced correctly it will not last either. When these conventional systems fail with average lifetime of 20 years according to the state and purdue professionals, what are the owners to do then? How much is it going to cost to put a pretreatment system in to try and recover it. The presby can be cleaned-jetted out and put back in service if needed.  Just food for thought Huh Huh
Logged
LM Excavating
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


LMExcavating.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2010, 12:37:49 AM »

Bottom line is there is better technology out there at a better price.

Put an RGF in front of anything and you pretty much have a lifetime system.

Look up Recirculating Gravel Filter on Washington State site.

My take is if they want to get rolling they need to at least size them to have a chance. The trench method is best but last I knew Presby was $5 ft and then you have about another $2 per foot in sand you are already at $7 ft and aint even got any equipment on the job yet. So material is over double of anything else for trenches.

Go ahead and use Presby that is your decision, but as a Professional I will stay away from it.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 01:52:32 PM by Stuart Meade » Logged

Since 1987 we have set the Benchmark for Quality and Innovation in the field of On-Site Sewage Disposal in Southwestern Indiana. Our Goal is to continue to lead the way and Offer only the highest quality in Design, Installation and Service for your Septic System.
http://www.lmexcavating.com/
jmenchhofer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2010, 10:00:49 AM »

The systems that are being installed here in Van Wert County are sized according to the Indiana design manual.  Presby is going to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) in Columbus on April 13 to request special device approval, which would allow use of the system statewide.  I hear that they will be seeking a different approval than they have in Indiana.  I'm guessing this means the systems will be longer.  Anyway, I've prepared a report for the TAC on my experiences with the systems over the first two years we've been using them.  I thought it might be good to share this information here in the context of this discussion.

It turns out the file is too large for me to attach to this post, so if you want to read the document, you can find it here:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/Ohio_Septic_Forum/topic/2556459/1/#new
Logged
jmenchhofer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2010, 11:39:00 AM »

I gave this presentation last Friday on my county's experience with the Enviro-Septic system so far.

Van Wert County's Alternative Sewage Treatment System Experience
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!